On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Nick Rogness wrote:
ACK! Read your message wrong...let me clarify.
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Peter Brezny wrote:
>
> >
> > Let's say I had two internal subnets that i'd like to nat with different
> > external ip's, while also doing static nat on one of each of the internal
> > ip's. Could i do that by doing something like thils:
> >
> > rc.conf
> > natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf1"
> > natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf2"
>
>
> Only the second line above will get executed.
>
Run the 2nd natd in /etc/rc.local.
> >
> > rc.firewall
> > $fwcmd add divert 8668 all from 10.1.1.1/24 to any via $oif
> > $fwcmd add divert 8669 all from 10.1.2.1/24 to any via $oif
> >
>
> The second rule will never get hit because the packets will only
> get divert through the first divert rule.
>
This was wrong. I didn't note the "2" in 10.1.2.1! Yes this
setup is fine.
> > natd.conf1
> > port 8668
> > interface fxp0
> > dynamic yes
> > alias_address external_ip_1
> > redirect_address 10.1.1.4 external_ip_1
> >
> > natd.conf2
> > port 8668
> > interface fxp0
> > dynamic yes
> > alias_address external_ip_2
> > redirect_address 10.1.2.4 external_ip_2
> >
>
> The port statement on the second set is the same as the
> first.
The above configs look OK...sorry for the confusion.
Nick Rogness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Keep on routing in a Free World...
"FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
