At 11:19 PM +0100 1/25/01, Paul Herman wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
>> <<On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:14:03 -0600 (CST), Jonathan Lemon
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> The important part was the
>> if (callout_pending(tp->tt_delack)) {
>> ...
>> tp->t_flags |= TF_ACKNOW;
>> }
>>
>> bit. This causes us to ack immediately where previously we would just
>> delay an already-schedule delayed ack.
>
>Yep, that does it. Simple. Elegant. I see now why my (bloated
>unintelligible) patch worked, it also didn't reset the timer when a
>delayed ack might have already been pending.
>
>OK, there are other parts of the code that do the same thing
>(TCP_REASS, SYN was ACKed, et. al.) but if no one objects, I'll
>send-pr the patch to be commited.
Was there ever a final resolution to this problem? I checked CVS and
there didn't appear to be any code changes made as a result of this
discussion. If this was a real problem, I'm wondering whether it
should be checked into -current and considered for MFC into 4.3.
Thanks,
Mark
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
