On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> /kernel: arp: 1.2.3.4 is on dc0 but got reply from 00:00:c5:79:d0:0c on dc1
>
> Hi can we axe this message already? I see the possibility of using
> two 100mbit cards on a switch with a gig uplink to be reason enough
> to either axe it, or make it a sysctl to quiet the warnings.
>
> I've also had this broken config setup as a temporary thing and
> my console getting flooded was also quite irritating.
>
> Anyone going to raise a rukus if I turn it
> a) off
> b) sysctl default off
> c) sysctl default on
>
> thanks,
> -Alfred
I have also suggested this (a sysctl knob) within the past few weeks and
had no negative responses. However, since I have not received any
messages saying "this exists for such-and-such a reason", I vote for (a).
If you don't do it soon, I will :-)
Guy
> ----- Forwarded message from Tim Gustafson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
>
> From: Tim Gustafson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Two NICs In FreeBSD
> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 23:37:06 -0500
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hello
>
> I just installed two NIC cards into my FreeBSD machine that are on the same
> LAN, each with a different IP. However, I keep getting this sort of
> message in my syslog:
>
> /kernel: arp: 1.2.3.4 is on dc0 but got reply from 00:00:c5:79:d0:0c on dc1
>
> I realize that the message is because it's getting two ARP replies, but
> this is normal (for this network, anyhow). How can I suppress these
> messages from appearing in the syslog? Is it OK to have both interfaces
> receiving ARP replies? Will this mess anything up?
>
> Tim
--
Guy Helmer, Ph.D.
Sr. Software Engineer, Palisade Systems --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.palisadesys.com/~ghelmer
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
