On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:20 PM, David Naylor <naylor.b.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > A quick update on the update to mono5. In theory everything should be > working (i.e. mono, monodevelop, etc). > > A review has also been created (so you can access the patch). Please test > it. > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12440
Hi David, I created a VM with fdb current and created a ports dir from svn under my user. I attempted to apply your patch file and part of it was rejected. It's most likely my error as I'm poor at patching. I haven't even looked it over yet, but I've got to run out for a bit. I'll check back later. Here is the output: Script started on Fri Sep 22 11:44:20 2017 russellh@fbd-12:~/ports % patch -p0 <../patches/D12440 Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: Mk/Uses/mono.mk |=================================================================== |--- Mk/Uses/mono.mk |+++ Mk/Uses/mono.mk -------------------------- Patching file Mk/Uses/mono.mk using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 10. Hunk #3 succeeded at 25. Hunk #4 succeeded at 75. Hunk #5 succeeded at 158. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/Makefile |=================================================================== |--- devel/monodevelop/Makefile |+++ devel/monodevelop/Makefile -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. Hunk #2 succeeded at 15. Hunk #3 succeeded at 88. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/distinfo |=================================================================== |--- devel/monodevelop/distinfo |+++ devel/monodevelop/distinfo -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/files/patch-Makefile.am |=================================================================== |--- devel/monodevelop/files/patch-Makefile.am |+++ /dev/null -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/files/patch-Makefile.am using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/files/patch-external_fsharpbinding_.paket_paket.targets |=================================================================== |--- devel/monodevelop/files/patch-external_fsharpbinding_.paket_paket.targets |+++ devel/monodevelop/files/patch-external_fsharpbinding_.paket_paket.targets -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/files/patch-external_fsharpbinding_.paket_paket.targets using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_AspNet_MonoDevelop.AspNet.csproj |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_AspNet_MonoDevelop.AspNet.csproj -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_AspNet_MonoDevelop.AspNet.csproj using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore.csproj |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore.csproj -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore.csproj using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_Properties_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore.addin.xml |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_Properties_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore.addin.xml -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_Properties_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore.addin.xml using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_packages.config |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_packages.config -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_addins_MonoDevelop.DotNetCore_packages.config using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_core_MonoDevelop.Core_MonoDevelop.Core.csproj |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_core_MonoDevelop.Core_MonoDevelop.Core.csproj -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/files/patch-src_core_MonoDevelop.Core_MonoDevelop.Core.csproj using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/nupkg-appveyor |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/nupkg-appveyor -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/nupkg-appveyor using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/nupkg-azure_appservice |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/nupkg-azure_appservice -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/nupkg-azure_appservice using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/nupkg-nuget |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/nupkg-nuget -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/nupkg-nuget using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/nupkg-nuget3 |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/nupkg-nuget3 -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/nupkg-nuget3 using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/nupkg-templating |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/monodevelop/nupkg-templating -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/nupkg-templating using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/monodevelop/pkg-plist |=================================================================== |--- devel/monodevelop/pkg-plist |+++ devel/monodevelop/pkg-plist -------------------------- Patching file devel/monodevelop/pkg-plist using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 74. Hunk #3 succeeded at 92. Hunk #4 succeeded at 187. Hunk #5 succeeded at 512. Hunk #6 succeeded at 612. Hunk #7 succeeded at 624. Hunk #8 succeeded at 767. Hunk #9 succeeded at 811. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/Makefile |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/Makefile -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/Makefile using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/distinfo |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/distinfo -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/distinfo using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/csc.exe |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/csc.exe -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/csc.exe using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/dotnet |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/dotnet -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/dotnet using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-cibuild.sh |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-cibuild.sh -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-cibuild.sh using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-dir.props |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-dir.props -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-dir.props using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-gen__build__info.sh |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-gen__build__info.sh -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-gen__build__info.sh using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-install-mono-prefix.sh |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-install-mono-prefix.sh -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-install-mono-prefix.sh using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-mono_facades_build.proj |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-mono_facades_build.proj -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-mono_facades_build.proj using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-packages_Microsoft.xunit.netcore.extensions.1.0.0-prerelease-00629-09_Microsoft.xunit.netcore.extensions.nuspec |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-packages_Microsoft.xunit.netcore.extensions.1.0.0-prerelease-00629-09_Microsoft.xunit.netcore.extensions.nuspec -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-packages_Microsoft.xunit.netcore.extensions.1.0.0-prerelease-00629-09_Microsoft.xunit.netcore.extensions.nuspec using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build.OM.UnitTests_project.json |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build.OM.UnitTests_project.json -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build.OM.UnitTests_project.json using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build.UnitTests_project.json |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build.UnitTests_project.json -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build.UnitTests_project.json using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build_project.json |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build_project.json -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Build_project.json using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_MSBuild_project.json |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_MSBuild_project.json -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_MSBuild_project.json using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Tasks.UnitTests_project.json |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Tasks.UnitTests_project.json -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Tasks.UnitTests_project.json using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Tasks_project.json |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Tasks_project.json -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Tasks_project.json using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Utilities.UnitTests_project.json |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Utilities.UnitTests_project.json -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-src_Utilities.UnitTests_project.json using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/files/patch-targets_roslyn_project.json |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/files/patch-targets_roslyn_project.json -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/files/patch-targets_roslyn_project.json using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/pkg-descr |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/pkg-descr -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/pkg-descr using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: devel/msbuild/pkg-plist |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ devel/msbuild/pkg-plist -------------------------- Patching file devel/msbuild/pkg-plist using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/fsharp/Makefile |=================================================================== |--- lang/fsharp/Makefile |+++ lang/fsharp/Makefile -------------------------- Patching file lang/fsharp/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. Hunk #2 succeeded at 12. Hunk #3 succeeded at 28. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/fsharp/distinfo |=================================================================== |--- lang/fsharp/distinfo |+++ lang/fsharp/distinfo -------------------------- Patching file lang/fsharp/distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 17. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/fsharp/files/patch-Makefile |=================================================================== |--- lang/fsharp/files/patch-Makefile |+++ lang/fsharp/files/patch-Makefile -------------------------- Patching file lang/fsharp/files/patch-Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 6. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/fsharp/pkg-plist |=================================================================== |--- lang/fsharp/pkg-plist |+++ lang/fsharp/pkg-plist -------------------------- Patching file lang/fsharp/pkg-plist using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 130. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/Makefile |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/Makefile |+++ lang/mono/Makefile -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 2. Hunk #2 succeeded at 15. Hunk #3 succeeded at 30. Hunk #4 succeeded at 70. Hunk #5 succeeded at 81. 1 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to lang/mono/Makefile.rej Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/distinfo |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/distinfo |+++ lang/mono/distinfo -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-configure.ac |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/files/patch-configure.ac |+++ lang/mono/files/patch-configure.ac -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-configure.ac using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 8. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-eglib_src_gfile-posix.c |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/files/patch-eglib_src_gfile-posix.c |+++ lang/mono/files/patch-eglib_src_gfile-posix.c -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-eglib_src_gfile-posix.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-mono_metadata_socket-io.c |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/files/patch-mono_metadata_socket-io.c |+++ /dev/null -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-mono_metadata_socket-io.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-mono_mini_mini-posix.c |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ lang/mono/files/patch-mono_mini_mini-posix.c -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-mono_mini_mini-posix.c using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-mono_profiler_ptestrunner.pl |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ lang/mono/files/patch-mono_profiler_ptestrunner.pl -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-mono_profiler_ptestrunner.pl using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-compiler.h |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-compiler.h |+++ /dev/null -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-compiler.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-proclib.c |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-proclib.c |+++ lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-proclib.c -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-proclib.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-threads.c |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-threads.c -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_mono-threads.c using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_w32handle.c |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_w32handle.c |+++ /dev/null -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-mono_utils_w32handle.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/files/patch-scripts_mono-heapviz |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/files/patch-scripts_mono-heapviz |+++ lang/mono/files/patch-scripts_mono-heapviz -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/files/patch-scripts_mono-heapviz using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lang/mono/pkg-plist |=================================================================== |--- lang/mono/pkg-plist |+++ lang/mono/pkg-plist -------------------------- Patching file lang/mono/pkg-plist using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. Hunk #2 succeeded at 194. Hunk #3 succeeded at 211. Hunk #4 succeeded at 286. Hunk #5 succeeded at 302. Hunk #6 succeeded at 413. Hunk #7 succeeded at 431. Hunk #8 succeeded at 547. Hunk #9 succeeded at 932. Hunk #10 succeeded at 977. Hunk #11 succeeded at 988. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1025. Hunk #13 succeeded at 1075. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1104. Hunk #15 succeeded at 1154. Hunk #16 succeeded at 1202. Hunk #17 succeeded at 1306. Hunk #18 succeeded at 2430. Hunk #19 succeeded at 2452. Hunk #20 succeeded at 2472. Hunk #21 succeeded at 2496. Hunk #22 succeeded at 2564. Hunk #23 succeeded at 2590. Hunk #24 succeeded at 2641. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/Makefile |=================================================================== |--- x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/Makefile |+++ x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/Makefile -------------------------- Patching file x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. Hunk #2 succeeded at 17. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/distinfo |=================================================================== |--- x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/distinfo |+++ x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/distinfo -------------------------- Patching file x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-configure |=================================================================== |--- x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-configure |+++ /dev/null -------------------------- Patching file x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-configure using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-configure.in.in |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-configure.in.in -------------------------- Patching file x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-configure.in.in using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-gnome_CanvasPathDef.custom |=================================================================== |--- x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-gnome_CanvasPathDef.custom |+++ /dev/null -------------------------- Patching file x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-gnome_CanvasPathDef.custom using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-sample_gconf_Makefile.am |=================================================================== |--- /dev/null |+++ x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-sample_gconf_Makefile.am -------------------------- Patching file x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/files/patch-sample_gconf_Makefile.am using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20/Makefile |=================================================================== |--- x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20/Makefile |+++ x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20/Makefile -------------------------- Patching file x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20/distinfo |=================================================================== |--- x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20/distinfo |+++ x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20/distinfo -------------------------- Patching file x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20/distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done russellh@fbd-12:~/ports % ls lang/mono Makefile Makefile.rej distinfo files pkg-message pkg-plist.orig Makefile.orig Makefile.rej.orig distinfo.orig pkg-descr pkg-plist russellh@fbd-12:~/ports % cat Makefile .rej cat: Makefile.rej: No such file or directory russellh@fbd-12:~/ports % cat lang/mono/Makefile.rej @@ -2,9 +2,8 @@ # $FreeBSD: head/lang/mono/Makefile 446741 2017-07-27 13:57:30Z mat $ PORTNAME= mono -PORTVERSION= 4.8.1.0 +PORTVERSION= 5.2.0.215 DISTVERSIONPREFIX= mono- -PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= lang MAINTAINER= m...@freebsd.org russellh@fbd-12:~/ports % exit exit Script done on Fri Sep 22 11:46:10 2017 Cheers, Russ > Regards > > On 25 August 2017 at 21:41, David Naylor <naylor.b.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 15 August 2017 12:21:20 Romain Tartière wrote: >> > Hi David, >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0200, David Naylor wrote: >> > > Here is an update on porting mono 5: >> > > - mono: 5.1.0.1 (needs to be updated to 5.2, tests run) >> > > - msbuild: 15.3 (needs tests ported and run, upstream bugs filed) >> > > - fsharp: 4.1.25 (WIP) >> > > - monodevelop: 7.0.1.24 (WIP) >> > > - gtksharp20: 2.12.45 (WIP) >> > > - avahi-sharp: 0.7 (not started) >> > > - bumping all dependent ports (not started) >> > > - exp-run (not started) >> > > >> > > Would anyone be interested in doing a (Phabricator) review? >> > >> > I don't actively use mono nowadays but sure, I can check if my old code >> > tests suites still pass with the update. I have just registered to >> > Phabricator and have no previous experience with this tool, so get ready >> > to teach me stuff ;-) >> >> Great, thanks. >> >> Here is a status update (with patch [1][3]). Things aren't ready yet, but >> as >> it >> stands: >> - lang/mono: 5.2.0.215 (tests failing in mcs/class/corlib >> [run-test-local]) >> - devel/msbuild: 15.3 (tests failing [with SIGABRT]) >> - lang/sharp: 4.1.25 (tests failing in math/measures/test.fsx [Invalid IL >> code]) >> - x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20: 2.12.45 >> - x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20: 2.24.4 >> WIP: >> - devel/monodevelop: 7.1.0.1297 (full nuget package restore required >> [extra >> nuget support required]) >> - devel/mono-addins: depreciate [2] (broken with mono5), fix dependencies >> TODO: >> - mono: test self hosting >> - update mono-lite version >> - avahi-sharp: 0.7 >> - bump all dependent ports >> - exp-run >> - commit to ports >> - upstream patches >> - fix tests >> >> Note that the failing tests don't worry me too much. Most of them are edge >> cases that won't affect the average user (i.e. not a blocker to commit to >> ports) - also I don't know how many tests are failing on other platforms >> (if >> any). >> >> [1] git clone https://github.com/DragonSA/ports; cd ports; git diff >> master..origin/mono5.2.0.215 >> [2] A general discussion needs to be had around nuget packages. How do we >> consume them? >> i) as downloads with each port containing a copy >> ii) local ports with consistency across the Ports Collections >> iii) A mixture of the above (i.e. (ii) is there is a native component, >> otherwise (i)) >> I prefer (ii) as I think it gives the end user the best leverage to patch >> issues with nuget packages locally (and to get updates without waiting on >> a) >> upstream, and b) us/ports maintainer). However, at this point that option >> is >> at 0% progress. >> [3] https://people.freebsd.org/~dbn/mono-20170825.diff.xz > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-mono@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mono > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mono-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-mono@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mono To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mono-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
