https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=293228
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Gritton <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Price from comment #3) In a more complex setup like this, where multiple jails use the same address, yes. The automatic setup and tear-down assume the common case of unshared addresses. Outside of that common case, I wouldn't say an IP address "belongs" to a jail, and the specified interface is how that belonging is established. The patch makes sense, uncommon as the case may be. There are a host of checks that jail(8) should be making as it creates and destroys jails, instead of merely assuming the state is what is expected and the results are what is desired. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
