On 02/14/13 07:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:40:58AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 02/14/13 06:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:06:29PM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 02/12/13 12:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I would like to mark some filesystem as jailable, here is the one I need:
linprocfs, tmpfs and fdescfs, I was planning to do it with adding a
allow.mount.${fs} for each one.
Anyone has an objection?
Would it make sense for linprocfs to use the existing allow.mount.procfs
flag?
Here is a patch that uses allow.mount.procfs for linsysfs and linprocfs.
It also addd a new allow.mount.tmpfs to allow tmpfs.
It seems to work here, can anyone confirm this is the right way to do it?
I'll commit in 2 parts: first lin*fs, second tmpfs related things
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/jail-fs.diff
There are some problems. The usage on the mount side of things looks
correct, but it needs more on the jail side. I'm including a patch just
of that part, with a correction in jail.h and further changes in kern_jail.c
Thank you the patch has been updated with your fixes.
One more bit (literally): PR_ALLOW_ALL in sys/jail.h needs updating.
- Jamie
_______________________________________________
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
