On 4/08/2016 6:27 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello Julian,
Thursday, August 4, 2016, 6:42:45 AM, you wrote:
A combination is less useful for me as you need to do:
I'm against this too, as I really love orthogonality, as everybody know
already, and your example is good example why.
20 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup record-state
21 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup
to make the entire session do the same thing.
Sometimes it could be
20 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup record-state
21 check-state
But only sometimes.
exactly.. I don't want OTHER packets coming past here to hit a
check-state yet.. I still have unfinished business with them.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
