Re: [RFC][patch] Two new actions: state-allow and state-deny

[Jason Lewis]

The possible issue is is that once NAT changes the IP address and
possibly the port number, state tracking can no longer be applied.
AKA, the packet headers before the NAT is different than the packet
headers after.  This is why NAT needs to track the state instead of
ipfw.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"