On Thursday 29 April 2010 3:21:00 pm Lukáš Czerner wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:18:09 -0400 > > From: John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> > > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > > Cc: Lukáš Czerner <czerner.lu...@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: ioctl, copy string from user > > > > On Thursday 29 April 2010 1:52:45 pm Lukáš Czerner wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I know that there are plenty of examples in the kernel code, but I > > > just can not get it working, so maybe I am doing some stupid mistake > > > I am not aware of. Please give me a hint if you can. > > > > > > What I want to do is simply call the ioctl from the userspace with > > > (char *) argument. Then, in kernel ioctl handling function copy the > > > string argument into the kernel space. I have tried it various ways, > > > everything without any success. > > > > > > *** Userspace *** > > > char name[MAXLEN]; > > > > > > strncpy(name, argv[1], MAXLEN); > > > fprintf(stdout,"Name: %s\n",name); > > > > > > if (ioctl(fd, MYIOCTL, name)) { > > > > On BSD systems, ioctl() copies the data into the kernel for you ahead of time. > > What does the definition of MYIOCTL look like? > > #define MYIOCTL _IOW('M', 0, char *)
Ok. In that case the argument to ioctl needs to be a pointer to a char *, not the raw char * itself. Try doing 'ioctl(fd, MYIOCTL, &name)' from userland to see if that fixes it. > > > And the second question. I have commented that I can allocate buffer > > > dynamically, but I suppose that there will be some locks involved so > > > I think I can not just use M_WAITOK, am I right ? > > > > malloc() and free() acquire their own locks internally, you do not need to > > hold any locks to call them. > > I probably does not express what I meant very clearly. My concern is > that when I am calling malloc with M_WAITOK I can sleep (be > rescheduled) and it may be bad thing if I am holding some lock, > because I can block others, am I right ? Generally yes, but it depends on the lock. If it is the vn_lock lock then it is ok to do a blocking malloc(). As a general rule I do try to call malloc() before acquiring locks (basically preallocating) whenever possible. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"