Hi Dan, Automatic reporting would end up being a mess given that panics can be caused by hardware problems. Having an autoreport check if memtest was run before it reports, or having it only run with -CURRENTmight be useful.
Sean ________________________________ From: jhell <jh...@dataix.net> To: Dan Naumov <dan.nau...@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 8:06:50 AM Subject: Re: Automated kernel crash reporting system On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 07:09, dan.naumov@ wrote: > Hello > > I noticed the following on the FreeBSD website: > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ideas.html#p-autoreport Has > there been any progress/work done on the automated kernel crash > reporting system? The current ways of enabling and gathering the > information required by developers for investigating panics and > similar issues are unintuitive and user-hostile to say the least and > anything to automate the process would be a very welcome addition. > > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > Hi Dan, I am assuming that the output of crashinfo_enable="YES" is not what you are talking about is it ? are you aware of it ? The info contained in the crashinfo.txt.N is pretty informative for developers, maybe your talking about another way of submitting it ? Regards, -- jhell _______________________________________________ freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
