On Tuesday 26 January 2010 4:52:35 pm Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > 2010/1/15 John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org>: > > On Friday 08 January 2010 12:19:29 pm Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This patch implements the "filesystems" file in the linux proc fs. > >> I have used it for some time without seeing any problems. Let me > >> know in case this is useful. > >> > >> Tested against 8.0-RELEASE-p1 > > > > This patch is not correct. It seems that /proc/filesystems is a list of > > available filesystems, not a list of mounted filesystems. E.g.: > > > >> cat /proc/filesystems > > nodev sysfs > > nodev rootfs > > nodev bdev > > nodev proc > > nodev sockfs > > nodev binfmt_misc > > nodev usbfs > > nodev usbdevfs > > nodev futexfs > > nodev tmpfs > > nodev pipefs > > nodev eventpollfs > > nodev devpts > > ext2 > > nodev ramfs > > nodev hugetlbfs > > iso9660 > > nodev relayfs > > nodev mqueue > > ext3 > > nodev rpc_pipefs > > nodev nfs > > nodev nfs4 > > nodev autofs > > > > To do the same thing in FreeBSD you would need to walk the vfsconf list > > instead. However, I'm not sure it is worth it to add this unless there > > are apps people commonly use that need it. > > You are right. I have another patch to do the right thing. However as > you pointed > out maybe it is not useful after all. Is it possible to delete the PR? > > Sorry for the noise > > PS: My current patch does not distinguish between common filesystems > and pseudo filesystems, where could I find that info? > > Cheers
Hmm, I'm not sure if there is an easy way to distinguish psuedo filesystems from device-backed filesystems. Hmm, maybe the VFCF_SYNTHETIC flag? If you have an updated patch I'm ok with reviewing it. What programs are you using that use this file in linprocfs? -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
