On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:47, fbsdlist@ wrote:
Anyone know if it is adjustable on a system with 1024MB of ram ? Is this
just being auto calculated by some other value ?

You may want to make sure that vm.kmem_size is set to a value much
larger than vfs.zfs.arc_max. Default value may be too small to allow
such a large ARC.

On a side note, I'm not sure that ZFS is a good match for system with
only 1G of RAM. By trial and error on my box with 8G or memory I've
figured out that I need to set arc_max ~1G below physical memory size
to avoid lockups under load. YMMV.


ZFS on this box with 1G has been quite enjoyable actually. With the settings I have posted I have not had any lockup on stable/7 and no sudden freezes or waits for transfers. So this entirely thus far has been a godsend. I had even put this thing through some of the tortures that others have posted to the list and not come up with the same results but better. There is obviously a lot of variables in this between hardware and configurations used so the results are minimal in comparison. With ZFS in place on this machine it performs a little bit under specs for the hardware but I wouldn't expect anything less for such a file-system.

--

 Thoughts & Prayers out to Haiti.

 jhell

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to