Erik Trulsson wrote: > > Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > >I also see that many "changes" in the CVS seem to be useless: there > > > >are no changes other than file version increments. > > > > > > SVN metadata changes will appear in CVS as version changes only. The > > > most obvious/common case is branching - branching a native CVS repo > > > just adds the branch tags. Branching a SVN repo replicates the tree > > > and the SVN->CVS exporter turns the branch into a commit that touches > > > each affected file. > > > > Thank you for the insight into theory, however the practical results > > are annoying. For example, running mergemaster has become a nightmare. > > It considers every file to be changed (unless you do some black magic > > with DIFF_OPTIONS to ignore \$FreeBSD:.*\$). > > Or if you use mergemaster's -F flag which seems to exist for exactly this > type of situation.
AFAIK it was not available before RELENG_7_2. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"