on 07/12/2009 17:20 Mel Flynn said the following: > b) vfork is encouraged for memory intensive applications, yet: > BUGS > This system call will be eliminated when proper system sharing mechanisms > are implemented. Users should not depend on the memory sharing semantics > of vfork() as it will, in that case, be made synonymous to fork(2). > > So is this entire problem eliminated when system sharing mechanisms are in > place and vfork considered the temporary work around or is copying of > superpages a problem that remains?
I think no :) This section is either already removed or is going to be. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
