Alan Cox schrieb am 2009-11-04: > Ed Schouten wrote: > >* Alan Cox <a...@cs.rice.edu> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I believe that Solaris does the exact opposite. > >>They provide MAP_ANONYMOUS for compatibility. It seems like a good > >>idea for us to do the same. > >Something like this? > >Index: mman.h > >=================================================================== > >--- mman.h (revision 198919) > >+++ mman.h (working copy) > >@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ > > */ > >#define MAP_FILE 0x0000 /* map from file (default) */ > >#define MAP_ANON 0x1000 /* allocated from memory, > >swap space */ > >+#ifndef _KERNEL > >+#define MAP_ANONYMOUS MAP_ANON /* For compatibility. */ > >+#endif /* !_KERNEL */ > > /* > > * Extended flags > Yes. If no one objects in the next day or so, then please commit > this change. > Alan should this compatibility addition be documented in the mmap(2) manual? any thoughts on the previous change request so mmap fails with MAP_ANON and pos=0? alex _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
