* Adrian Penisoara <a...@freebsd.ady.ro> wrote: > Maybe we should also think about compatibility with System V Unix / Linux > -- I have encountered quite a lot of scripts expecting "ps -ef" to give an > "all processes" output. It would not hurt to review what the Linux folks did > with their ps(1) -- it supports 3 kinds of options for UNIX/BSD/GNU flavors.
In my opinion we should just implement ps(1) as documented in the POSIX Onlinepubs. If it turns out it lacks certain features we want, we could consider adding this to procstat(1) instead. I am of course too lazy to work on this. ;-) -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpcZxeT4pqza.pgp
Description: PGP signature
