On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Shaowei Wang (wsw) <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Roman Divacky <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:34:29PM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote: > > > Hi, hackers! > > > > > > Recently I am playing the clangbsd i386 branch and it works. I've > noticed > > > that clang using gcc to linking object code or even doing assembling. > > > > > > clang from FreeBSD perspective will be a whole compiler tool chain or > > just > > > another C/C++ compiler (may using system's [GNU]as and [GNU]ld) ? > > > > llvm people are working on "mc" which is a native assembler/dissasembler. > > so the only part of the toolchain missing will be linker... now we > > need as/ld (and gnu driver that knows how to talk to them) > > > So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler tool > chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature. > > > > > > > > > roman > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > Well I did build 8.0-Beta2 with clang the latest svn though seems to have broke the usb compile for me. Most likely due to a commit that was done but clang is pretty mature to compile most things but for now I just have CC=/usr/bin/gcc in my make.conf to build ports _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
