On 2009-05-01 15:50:38, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Fri, 1 May 2009 20:21:13 +0100 > xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > Checking back through my sent mail from the DRI thread, this version > > of -STABLE was checked out and compiled on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:42:51 > > +0100. > > > > The machine was so new that I hadn't even set the clock, so the kernel > > timestamps appear to be Jan 1. > > > > I'll make an attempt to check out today's -STABLE and compile it but > > I'm not optimistic that the machine will actually be able to build > > world without reverting to a release first. > > You can always try to bypass namecache altogether while you are > building the new kernel: do sysctl debug.vfscache=0
Hi. Updating to today's -STABLE appears to have fixed the problem (or at least it doesn't occur for the usage described in the PR!). Thanks! xw _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
