* Max Laier <m...@love2party.net> wrote: > So to answer your first question, submitting 101 patches to rearrange 101 > structs is certainly a wasted effort. However, if you take a good look at > the > 2000 holes, identify an interesting subset and submit a patch to fix that > subset ... that would be a worthwhile effort ... IMHO.
I guess it's also a wasted effort to reduce struct tty from 8xx to 7xx bytes, because it still allocates 1024 bytes of memory using malloc(9). I guess we should mainly focus on structures that are allocated using uma(9) or are slightly bigger than 2^n. -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpixDBOrX3k4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
