On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:49:19 -0400 > "Alexander Sack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Is this a bug or not in FreeBSD's rtld? >> >> -aps > > It is not. In case it was not clear before, I maintain that you _ask_ > rtld for wrong behaviour and you get back what you asked for, down to > the letter. 'Tasting' libraries just because someone somewhere want to > screw up their configuration does not seem right to me at all.
I maintain that rtld should not load 32-bit libraries for a 64-bit binary. That is WRONG anyway you look at it. And again, if it checked the arch type and skipped libutil.so.5 in /usr/lib32 it would fall back to checking /lib and things would work. Moreover, if /usr/lib had major number links just like /usr/lib32 has, this would again have worked without issue. I believe this will be fixed on the other side of the fence (not setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include /usr/lib32 to begin wtih) but still, my point still stands. -aps _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
