Lothar Braun schrieb:
Robert Watson wrote:
My primary concern about some of these replacement installer projects
is that they've placed a strong focus on making them graphical -- I
actually couldn't care less about GUIs (and I think they actually
hurt my configurations, since I use serial consoles a lot), but what
I do want is a very tight and efficient install process, which I feel
sysinstall does badly on (not just for the reasons you specify).
Hmm, how should a tight and efficient installation process look like
in your opinion? And what are the other points that are bad in
systinstall?
Mass-installation via PXE-booting is a mess (how can you have to pack
the install.cfg file into the mfsroot diskimage???).
Take a look at kickstart+cobbler from RedHat for a system with some
thought behind this process.
I don't care the least about GUI or not GUI. I'd like to to able to
deploy them as seamlessly as the CentOS/RHEL boxes.
Rainer
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
