Quoting Roman Divacky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:04:16 +0200):

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:39:06AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting John Kozubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 19 Jun 2008
14:38:11 -0700 (PDT)):

>First, a bounty has been posted here:
>
>http://blog.kozubik.com/john_kozubik/2007/12/bounty-posted-f.html
>

From the site:
---snip---
I will pay $200 to whoever can compose a working and stable recipe for
running Adobe Flash 9 inside of the FreeBSD native version of Opera 9
on FreeBSD 6.x. This shouldn't be that hard - in fact, there is
already a linux-flashplugin9 port.
---snip---

Comments from other people with some more money not included here...

And now the sad reality check: linux-flashplugin9 will _never_ work on
6.x (lack of linux 2.6 emulation, and this is not a MFC candidate).

Getting it to work on 7.x is possible. "All what you need" is
nspluginwrapper to get it running in the native
firefox/opera/whatever, and someone who is willing to debug the
linuxulator (on -current, as there is a more complete 2.6
compatibility there, and this can be MFCed to 7.x) and find the
bug/problem which is causing the crashes. Whoever is willing to tackle
this: head over to emulation@ (CCed) and ask what debugging
possibilities we have in the linuxulator.

I tried to debug the flash9 and failed badly. It might be that I overlooked
something trivial but...

the flash9 is a big binary-only monster and basically the only trace
of what its doing you can get is a syscall-trace. Which is not that much

I think enabling the the linuxulator debug stuff and maybe adding some more printfs at some places can reveal some more stuff... with some in-deep reviewing of what happens.

useful. I didnt find any missing syscalls or something like that and the
fail is a complete mystery for me.... otoh I looked at this a LOONG time ago.

Which is in indication that there are some (subtle) differences between the linuxulator and the real linux we have to track down.

I might want to look at it again (after some other things settle)


anyway... I dont think that flash9 crashes are related to 2.6 emulation in any
way. iirc it runs (and crashes) on 2.4 as well. I remember it crashes in

Hmmm... now I'm not sure anymore, but I thought we had reports that it runs better with 2.6...

Bye,
Alexander.

--
I wish I was a sex-starved manicurist found dead in the Bronx!!

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to