On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
top doesn't get TIME right for threaded processes. How about this small
change:
Could you file a PR for this so that it doesn't get lost?
Thanks!
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
--- usr.bin/top/machine.c-orig 2008-06-12 23:06:08.000000000 -0500
+++ usr.bin/top/machine.c 2008-06-12 23:06:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -725,6 +725,7 @@
prev_pp = pp;
} else {
prev_pp->ki_pctcpu += pp->ki_pctcpu;
+ prev_pp->ki_runtime += pp->ki_runtime;
}
}
(Sorry if the mail client messes up the patch, but it is so short that it can
be easily entered by hand.)
I do realize that this is not foolproof, because it won't measure any threads
that have finished. But it is perhaps a bit better than the current state of
affairs, which randomly picks a runtime of one of the threads.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
