On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:47:53AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Secondly, the following FAQ entry and documentation from Mozilla is of > concern, specifically the last paragraph of the FAQ entry, since there > is ongoing work in the ports collection to support parallel building, > which would surely use fork() or locks):
I don't think this is applicable. > Thirdly, there is the concern of disk space. There are a substantial > number of users who have FreeBSD on embedded systems or systems with > little or no space, who use binary packages (pkg_add -r), which of > course still makes use of /var/db/pkg. SQLite DBs grow over time, and > don't shrink in size unless you use auto-vacuum mode or execute the > VACUUM query: It is trivial to recreate the database, so I don't think this is a concern either. I should point again that it will result in a non-trivial increase in size. > Fourthly, it doesn't sound as if storage SQLite databases on an NFS > mount is a good idea, and I've a feeling some people have /var NFS > mounted (diskless systems for example): Same applies to BDB and basically anything that depends on fcntl to work. Basically, as long as you have /var per host (you don't share /var, do you?), it will just work as the *local* locks are working. The problem with NFS comes form the fact that multiple hosts might not share them. Joerg _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
