on 24/04/2008 01:39 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 23/04/2008 22:49 John Baldwin said the following: >> Events have a subsystem associated with them, so devfs events would use >> their >> own subsystem type to avoid that sort of confusion. > > Thank you for straightening me - for some reason I was thinking about > "+"/"-" (attach/detach) events, but I see that "!" (notification) would > be much more appropriate. As you said, this can be completely modeled > after IF notifications.
Do you think it would be better to post notification from make_dev*() in kern_conf.c or from devfs_create()? I mean will such notification be useful if there is no devfs to access the device from userland? -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
