Vadim Goncharov wrote: > > Looked at the patch. Some line are changed e.g. in NAT definitions without any > visible changes, strange. > > Also, you're adding 7 opcode in the kernel, 2 for match and 5 for setting, > while having single "modip" action in userland. In the case of significantly > changing compilation rulesm, etc., we may need many new opcodes so we should > not waste them. For example, your O_IPTOSPRE is redundant because we already > have O_IPPRECEDENCE which compiler could utilize while retainig more ABI > compatibility. > > I can correct and extend your patch for DSCP/TTL/any bytes (not forgetting > credits, of course), if you're too busy... > > Of course, I've interest in any external support, because I need to finish my degree project and I'm a bit busy. Any help are welcome and please feel free to re-work the patch. Just like the really the most important thing is the *modip*, I'm happy that you work within this idea. I'd like to see *modip* committed.
I continue to my research and if I've some time to work with ipfw or another mechanism that have some relation with my project degree, I'll make. Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo (__) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\\'',) http://www.FreeBSD.org \/ \ ^ Power To Server. .\. /_)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
