On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:13:04AM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote: > Greetings, > > > Ilias Marinos wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have a jail to my FreeBSD-STABLE, in which I run some > > > uname -a will be more helpful then "FreeBSD-STABLE". > > services.I have configured and setup this jail using ezjail-admin. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ jls > > JID IP Address Hostname Path > > 1 192.168.1.100 ws /usr/jails/ws > > /usr/jails/ws > > > > #Jails > > ezjail_enable="YES" > > ifconfig_lo1="192.168.1.100 netmask 0xffffffff" # Jail iface > > > > I use lo1 as jail interface and I nat internet traffic to it with pf: > > nat on $ext_if from $ws to any -> ($ext_if) > > > > Today I 've tried to scp a big directory inside the jail and > > I've noticed that I was secure copying with 2-3MB/s .That sounds too > > weird for me and I would like to hear some opinions , for what it may be > > the problem. > > > > > You should investigate where the bottle-neck is. It's probably not in > the network protocol. > Most probably it is limitation of your CPU or your HDD(s). > I think (not sure) jail have default limit to % of the CPU resources, so > if you encrypt the stream > most probably the limitation is in the CPU. > You can check http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits for more > information.
Based upon that wiki page I'm led to believe that this is not in any branch of FreeBSD yet. That is, it's not in CVS. -- WXS _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
