David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:33:41PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2008-02-23 16:48, "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This knee-jerk reaction against gnu find functionality baffles me.
The changes are trivial and make FreeBSD more compatible. It is such
an obvious no-brainer that I frankly didn't expect anybody to bat an
eye.
So should I expect similar knee-jerk reactions to the just committed
`finger compatibility' option to implement du -l for hardlinks?
You added a new useful feature - and you based the option letter on
prior-art (and resumable doen't conflict with POSIX).
can we form an anti-knee-jerk cabal that can get a quorum when needed?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
