OutbackDingo wrote: >> I suppose you know about fromcvs. I also guess you know that I suggest >> using git instead of hg. Doesn't produce nasty large index files either :) > So would you think cvs -> git -> hg might be easier to accomplish ?? > Since one of my goals is to update projects Ive done based on FreeBSD > that require OS level updating
No, I think git is the better SCM, but that's a personal decision. Fromcvs converts to both hg and git, using the same algorithm. I'd appreciate any help fleshing out the last bugs (also re: scalability). I'm considering it beta grade quality, but I know of many people using it on a daily basis without problems. cheers simon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
