On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:41:03PM -0400, Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coleman Kane wrote: >> Lev Serebryakov wrote: >>> Hello ports, >>> >>> Latest versions of `mingw32-binutils' and `mingw32-bin-msvcrt' were >>> committed. >>> `mingw32-gcc' is on pipeline. >>> But it is BIG update: new version is 4.2.0 >>> I ask you to test this `almost new' port before commit. >>> >>> http://lev.serebryakov.spb.ru/download/port-mingw32-gcc-4.2.0.tar.gz >>> >>> Many thanks to Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who helps me to >>> prepare this update. >>> >> I'd like to know what everyone else's experience with these new mingw32- >> ports are. So far I have been building Win32 applications from my FreeBSD >> box with these versions quite successfully. I think that the binutils and >> GCC are actually newer than the ones currently shipping with the MinGW32 >> binary distribution too. >> >> -- >> Coleman Kane >> > I haven't seen any activity on the above email, and I am curious if: > 1) It was missed (and this really does affect people) > 2) Nobody cross-compiles using the mingw32-* ports (it is really very > handy!) > 3) Nobody really cares that mingw32-gcc will move from 3.4.5 --> 4.2.0 > > Please, if this affects you test out the above port tarball! Otherwise, > this will end up going in and not take into account any problems that might > arise in your environment. > > -- > Coleman Kane > > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Hello ports; Hello Coleman Kane, I'd like thank you for your work. I installed this version of mingw32-gcc. Until now I've not any problem; I's a great port. The only problem was with the mingw32-binutils port (it was broken for size mismatch), but I committed a little patch. Thank you very match. Bye by JM -- HASKELL: To call a spade a thpade.
pgpIhvtc4UfyV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
