On 2007-May-27 16:12:54 -0700, Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Given the size and complexity of the port system I have long >felt that rather than do everything via more and more complex >Mk/*.mk what is is needed is a ports server and a thin CLI >frontend to it.
I don't believe this is practical. Both package names and port dependencies depend on the options that are selected as well as what other ports are already installed. A centralised ports server is not going to have access to this information. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpfPtzrTbSlc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
