Recently noticed that our sed(1) differs from its GNU analog in that in -i mode it considers all files as a single sequence of lines while the latter treats each file independently. The in-line mode isn't in POSIX, so it isn't really clear which way is correct.
Aren't sed's addresses required to be cumulative across its input files? http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/sed.html -- FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"