On Saturday 06 January 2007 14:27, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> M. Warner Losh wrote:
>  > Also, kenv(KENV_GET, ... is used a lot.  Maybe it makes sense to have
>  > a simple kenvget call.  Would make a few lines a little shorter if
>  > nothing else.
> 
> KENV_GET is used three times.  Using a wrapper function
> would save 7 characters per call.  I don't think it's
> really worth it.  But if you insist, I can update the
> patch with such a function.

I think just using kenv() is fine.

-- 
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to