On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less
configuration is the best option out there. The ability to quickly go
through series of hands/reboots without any associated fsck runs and
without the risk of terminally damaging any local FS is priceless. If
qemu can be tricked into disk-less booting, it should be just as good
though.
--
Alexander Kabaev
Alexander, when you say disk-less configuration, are you referring to
booting from a network image/server? That's an interesting idea. I'm
fairly new to FreeBSD development also, and prefer the speed of a
dedicated box, but recently suffered my first corrupted beyond repair
system.
Kevin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
