John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 05:50, Julian Stacey wrote:
> > NFS fails on files >= 4 Gig Can someone confirm please.
> >
> > uname -r # 6.1-RELEASE (both hosts)
> > # echo "1024 1024 * 4 * 1 + p" | dc # 4194305
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=junk bs=1k count=4194305
> > ls -l junk # 4294968320 bytes
> > rsh an_nfs_host ls -l /host/`hostname -s`/usr/tmp/junk # 1024 byte size!
> > # with count=4194304, ls shows 0 bytes.
> >
> > It's not AMD failing, but NFS, as with an /etc/amd.map with a
> > non NFS entry for my host "laps" for efficiency (in case some
> > shell on host laps mounts itself), the full size 4294968320 is seen.
> > /etc/amd.map
> > /defaults type:=host;fs:=${autodir}/${rhost};rhost:=${key}
> > laps type:=link;fs:=..
> >
> > It's not just ls, cmp fails too, ( as also does my
> > http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/cmpd/cmpd.c )
> > cmp -z junk /host/laps/usr/tmp/junk # junk /host/laps/usr/tmp/junk differ:
> > size
> >
> > Is send-pr appropriate ?
>
> Are you using NFS v2 or v3? v2 doesn't support large files.
>
> John Baldwin
Thanks, I don't know ! Whatever 6.1-RELEASE comes standard with.
After your mail I did cd /usr/ports ; echo */*nfs*
net-mgmt/nfsen net/nfsshell net/pcnfsd net/unfs3
/usr/ports/net/unfs3 offers a non ernel V3 server
but I'd still need a v3 client I suppose ?
Are 6.2-pre or current using V3 NFS then ?
Hints which way to jump / where to RTFM please :-)
--
Julian Stacey. BSD Unix C Net Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen http://berklix.com
Mail Ascii, not HTML. Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
http://berklix.org/free-software
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
