> On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) > > dual cpu. > > > > running iperf -c (receiving): > > > > freebsd-4.10 0.0-10.0 sec 936 MBytes 785 Mbits/sec > > freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec 413 MBytes 346 Mbits/sec > > freebsd.6.1 0.0-10.0 sec 366 MBytes 307 Mbits/sec > > freebsd-6.2 0.0-10.0 sec 344 MBytes 289 Mbits/sec > > > > btw, iperf -s (xmitting) is slightly better > > freebsd-4.10 0.0-10.0 sec 664 MBytes 558 Mbits/sec > > freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec 390 MBytes 327 Mbits/sec > > freebsd-6.1 0.0-10.0 sec 495 MBytes 415 Mbits/sec > > freebsd-6.2 0.0-10.0 sec 487 MBytes 408 Mbits/sec > > > > so, it seems that as the release number increases, the em > > throughput gets worse - or iperf is. > > You arent measuring em, you're measuring RELEASES on > your hardware, is this a surprise on a P3, no.
still, 63% drop in performance doesn't cause much joy, does it? [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2 _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
