> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 08:36, Danny Braniss wrote: > > Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and: > > > > SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz > > K8-class > > CPU) one 70g sata disk > > DELL 2950: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3192.98-MHz K8-class CPU) > > 4 sata disks + raid0 > > > > they both run identical 6.1-STABLE. > > > > my 'cpu benchmark' shows the amd being much better than the intel. > > but, doing a make buildworld give interesting results: > > > > dell-2950 : make -j16 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m17.41s real > > 1h3m3.26s user 17m15.07s sys > > dell-2950 : make -j8 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m8.28s real > > 1h2m59.38s user 16m16.20s sys > > > > sunfire : make -j16 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m21.38s real 49m6.68s > > user 14m22.64s sys > > sunfire : make -j8 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 23m47.69s real 48m53.58s > > user 13m44.81s sys > > > > which probably says something about my 'cpu benchmark' :-( > > but why is the user time so much different between the boxes? > > Maybe the sunfire's CPU is faster, but has to wait on the harddisk. The > buildworld 'benchmark' is probably for a large part I/O bound.
nah, i have run the makefile with serveral different disks, ie raid0, raid5, FC, iSCSI, SAS, and the numbers/times don't change (or not significantly). and in any case, it's the dell that has the fastest disks, but the user time is the largest. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"