"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.09.2006 18:01:08:
> In the past I did some silly measurements and found that sysctls were > slower by a small amount. I never could figure out why, since the > path to the sysctl seemed like it would be shorter than the path to > the read. This was in the 3.x timeframe, so your best bet is to code > up both and see which one is better today. OK i did that and it seems to be still the same. "read" seems to be faster then th sysctl call. I got about 8.7 seconds for 100,000 sysctl reads and 1.8 seconds for 100,000 read calls. Measured on a Thinkpad with 75MHz CPU frequency. Thanks Maik _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
