On Sunday 30 July 2006 21:30, Kip Macy wrote: > > si_addr doesn't contain the faulting pc, it contains the address > > that > > So either the comment is wrong, or that is a technically incorrect > kludge. However, given that a number of the other fields are not > filled out at all, the real objective should be to keep applications > working.
Well, the comment is correct except in case of a page fault. But this is different from stable. In stable si_addr is a copy of tf_err, which, because of the kludge, holds the fault address in case of a page fault... I'm glad to see this code has been cleaned up.
pgpE7JYOK18bJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
