[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> But prior to long-term discussion, please commit my 4 patches
> firstly. They are nearly CPP-independent and do no harm to current
> FreeBSD kernel.
We don't do the kind of changes you propose without discussion.
> --- kern.mk.orig Fri Jun 30 05:15:25 2006
> +++ kern.mk Mon Jul 10 18:42:43 2006
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
> .if ${CC} == "icc"
> CFLAGS+= -nolib_inline
> .else
> -CFLAGS+= -ffreestanding
> +CFLAGS+= -fno-builtin
> .endif
Are you sure this is correct? I'm pretty certain it isn't. The
kernel's C environment is not a hosted implementation.
> --- systm.h.orig Mon Jul 10 05:42:58 2006
> +++ systm.h Mon Jul 10 18:44:01 2006
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
> int suword16(void *base, int word);
> int suword32(void *base, int32_t word);
> int suword64(void *base, int64_t word);
> -intptr_t casuptr(intptr_t *p, intptr_t old, intptr_t new);
> +intptr_t casuptr(intptr_t *p, intptr_t old, intptr_t __new__);
This is a namespace violation. A simpler solution is to leave out
argument names entirely.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
