On 05/11/06 20:53, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >> On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata" >>>> >>> Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? >>> Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug. >> >> Send patches. > > Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent > reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that the > quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the > release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend all is > fine and dandy, then there is not much patches will do. Heck, im still > waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems, as he so graciously > offered, but couldn't deliver. I offered to work with him and provide > help, he never replied to my emails.
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it. So, you're still waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems and he couldn't deliver? Huh? I quote you (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-May/025209.html): "Scott, thanks for the very generous gesture, but i cant ask you something like this." -Jonathan -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature