On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:26:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am still having huge troubles with using natd with the "divert natd" > = in ipfw. > I can only nat all my traffic or none. > What i would = like to do is simply nat accoring to box or service for > a particular bo= x. > This is a example of what works for natting all traffic. > <= BR>ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via tun0 > Now i = have tried the likes of "ipfw add divert natd all from > 10.150.200.= 35 to 196.25.211.150 via tun0" > And that does not work. Ive tried many examples. And cannot come right. > All = i need to do is nat for a novell srv trying to access a mail > serve= r pop account. > Currently im forced to use port forward utilities t= hat dont work. > Help would really be appreciated. why don't you simply use pf? pf simply rocks, and the natting facility is built in(i don't see the point of userspace natting). i would give it a try if i were you
Bye, Gergely Czuczy mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: http://phoemix.harmless.hu/phoemix.pgp Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
