In most implementation I saw it was coupled with a rfid card (short
distance < 1inch (2.5cm))
And for usage at entrance of datacenter -> a network of camera.
Its not spy proof... but good enought for your average lamer.
Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
In that case, it means the "matching" is a proabilistic
distance-computing algorithm. This sux, for any sort of real remote
logins.
Yes. That's probably an accurate description.
I'm by no means an expert in the biometric field, far from it.
But in my most humble option, I think it would be *very* difficult
to obtain an identical sample every time.
When it comes to fingerprints the environment probably plays a big role
in the sample, for example light conditions, skin moisture, dust on the
sensor etc.
Maybe there are other people on this list with better insight in this
field?
Fredrik Lindberg
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Alain Hebert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net fax 514-990-9443
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
