On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:54:01PM +0300, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > [..] > > > >Note that sigprocmask() and pthread_sigprocmask() are equivalent. I > >don't even think pthread_sigprocmask() is in the standard any longer > >(it used to be in an older version of the standard). New applications > >should be using sigprocmask(). > > > > Yes I noticed. However, this just happens to be the implementation > (probably pthread_sigmask is a wrapper to sigprocmask). > > This might not be the case on other OS, so for portability I'll stick to > the pthread_sigmask in threads, and sigprocmask in single threaded apps. > For portability you should stick to the standards.
Good luck!
--
Vasil Dimov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
pgpwZHQNWp4He.pgp
Description: PGP signature
