--- John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: ... > > It's definately interesting, but doubtful will ever be imported to > replace libc's malloc for one reason.. the CDDL is effectively the > GPL:
... It's nevertheless less viral. I don't want libumem in the base distribution though... it can be a port. Many people find a userland malloc useful. > > That's why I started work on rewriting a allocated based upon the > paper so that it'd have a BSD license... I haven't worked on it much, > and now that jemalloc is here, who knows... > Hmmm... from what I've read on mailing lists and blogs... while libumem is in general a good performer, certain applications, like X, can actually get a performance hit. Where libumem shines is while debugging: memory leaks, double frees, can be found very easily. I agree jemalloc is here to stay. Pedro. ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"