On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:16:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +> On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:54:18AM +0100, Gilbert Fernandes wrote: +> > +> > The FreeBSD UFS is the FFS accessed through the VFS layer, but basically +> > the format is the same. If you want to have access, from FreeBSD, to +> > NetBSD partitions, make sure the NetBSD partitions have been formated +> > using FFSv2 which is the port of UFS to NetBSD. There are some +> > differences though : no ACL support nor snapshots available there. +> +> FFS v1 and v2 are both working. I'm using that everyday. The one part +> which needs attention is soft updates: FreeBSD / DragonFly have it as +> permanent flag, NetBSD as mount option.
Interesting. In FreeBSD fsck(8) works differently for SU-enabled FS, so having SU as a mount option won't be possible (if we want to protect our users from a foot-shooting). And because of the way SU works, it is possible to run background fsck, as the only problems are unreferenced objects (inodes, blocks, etc.). -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
pgpBMllV0FSGm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
