On 10/27/05 04:16 Scott Long said the following:
an example would be using (BUS_DMASYNC_POSTREAD|BUS_DMASYNC_PREWRITE) which
would be 0x03 in freebsd 4.x and 0x06 in freebsd 5.x. the gotcha is that
0x03 in freebsd 4.x is BUS_DMASYNC_POSTWRITE. so therefore,
BUS_DMASYNC_POSTREAD|BUS_DMASYNC_PREWRITE will be BUS_DMASYNC_POSTWRITE in
4.x which in the syscall is actually a no op.

Yes, that is fugly.  Just don't use the | versions for now I would guess.

Trying to maintain source compatibility between 4.x and 5.x/6.x will make you encounter a whole lot more problems than just this.

could you elaborate on what busdma related problems there'd be, between 4.x and 5.x/6.x ? do, for example, the inner workings of the bus_dma* syscalls work the same on both ?

--
Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to