As Ian Dowse wrote to me at Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:08:57PM +0100: > The patch in from the email below may help with the wdrain state - > can you see if it makes any difference? > No, it does not make any. Mainly because my USB 2.0 controller is NEC-based (not VIA), so LOSTINTRBUG flag is not set. Anyway, thanks for your help! -- rea _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
- Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.0 ports Eygene A. Ryabinkin
- Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.0 ports Rojer
- Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.0 ports Scott Long
- Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.0 ports Scott Long
- Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.0 po... Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.... Rojer
- Re: Low umass performance with U... Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.... Scott Long
- Re: Low umass performance with U... Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.... Eygene A. Ryabinkin
- Re: Low umass performance with U... Eygene A. Ryabinkin
