> This is intentational. We try to avoid having headers bring in more > then absolutly required when included. I'm not sure what your second > question means.
With my second question I wanted to ask if this intention is only for kernel level code or a general one. I am asking this, because somewhen in a project that I was not actually participating in I heard or read a rule that roughly said: "all include files have to include all files they depend on and compile cleanly", but that project was on a user space program. Dirk _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
