On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 01:15:35PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 02:06:32PM +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:52:34PM +0200, Dario Freni wrote:
> > > Vasil Dimov wrote:
> > > > Even we can use
> > > > if [ -d /tmp -a -w /tmp ] ; then
> > > > or (which is equivalent)
> > > > if [ -d /tmp ] && [ -w /tmp ] ; then
> > > > and save external commands (mkdir) execution and directory
> > > > creation/deletion at all.
> > > 
> > > You can't use test -w here. The script is checking if there is a
> > > read-only filesystem. -w checks only the file flags (according to the
> > > man page, at least).
> > > 
> > That's correct, -w cannot be used to check read-only filesystem.
> 
> Actually, you can. That's not portable behaviour though.
> 

Well, look what I discovered:

# mount |grep read-only
/usr/ports on /mnt/ar0s2d/usr/ports5 (nullfs, local, read-only)
# sh -c '[ -w /mnt/ar0s2d/usr/ports5 ] && echo writeable'
# bash -c '[ -w /mnt/ar0s2d/usr/ports5 ] && echo writeable'
writeable
#

One should really not rely on this.

Attachment: pgpSOOCQPo2Pj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to